RSS Feed

Tag Archives: writing

Chicks Unravel Time – Available NOW!

Posted on

I spent my blogging time yesterday being angry at Tony Harris, when what I should’ve been doing was focusing on the release of an all-female Doctor Who anthology of which I’m lucky enough to be a part!

CHICKS UNRAVEL TIME was released yesterday, and I’m so thrilled it’s finally out in the world! My essay, “All of Gallifrey’s a Stage: The Doctor In Adolescence,” appears in it, and I’m very proud of it – mostly, because it’s the result of me stepping out of my comfort zone and writing about a Doctor I didn’t particularly like at first. It’s a great book with an amazing list of contributors. Even if you could give a shit about MY writing, I’d highly recommend this book for the rest of the talent that’s in it!

Chicks Unravel Time, edited by the fabulous Deborah Stanish and the wonderful LM Myles, is available NOW wherever books are sold!

BTW – If I were doing a series of readings in the Los Angeles area…who’d come? :) (comment below!)

THE FRAY PROJECT: A New Gift Horse (Writing)

Posted on

I’ve been talking about a Castle spec script that I’ve been working on/struggling with for a while now. My first-ever spec that I wrote completely wrong at first (structure? What’s that? You mean, the main character has to be, like, in it? Like, a lot? And has to, like, do stuff?), but the plot and theme of which I wanted to salvage, because they were important to me. Also, there’s the fact that I wanted to learn from this script. My hope was that if I could fix my mistakes here, I’d be better off.

However, I’ve hit a wall on it, mostly because I started it completely wrong, so the entire foundation of the story is unstable. I tried patching it up, but haven’t been able to successfully, and now I’ve just stared at the thing so long I can’t even see it anymore. I want to make a good spec out of it. I want this particular story written for these characters. But I need distance from it. Right now, I’m still too attached to certain scenes as written, even though they’re wrong, and I need to get to a place where I can start from scratch. I’m not there on this script right now.

So, Castle is in the metaphorical drawer. (Remember when people actually put scripts in drawers, because they actually typed them on paper? I know. Me either. ;) )

BUT, I’ve been working on a new spec from scratch (outline, treatment, the works) where I’m putting everything I learned from all the mistakes I made on the Castle script to good use. It’s a spec for Grimm. What are these things I’ve learned? Well, they might seem like common sense, but I’m recording them here in all their ridiculousness in the hopes that my mentioning them might spare some of you some trouble. :) This way, you can make your own, entirely different mistakes!

  • When I first wrote the Castle script, I thought that having watched the show and “knowing it really well” was enough to write a script. Um, no. You need to know your show on the page if you want to write it. What you see on the screen and what you see in a script are two totally different things. I started looking at old Castle scripts long after I’d already made my first set of “revisions” (I put that word in quotes, because even my revisions at the time were wrong) to the first version of my spec, but by then it was too late. I was trying to shrink and stretch my spec to fit into the Castle mold, but it was never really designed to do that, so the whole thing just fell apart. With Grimm, after I got a glimmer of an idea for a story I wanted to tell, I immediately got a hold of the scripts for three episodes to see how many acts each had, how many pages each act had, how characters were included, when certain procedural plot points tended to happen… When I started to outline and write a treatment for my episode, the story came much more easily than the Castle one did, because I knew where certain parts of the story were supposed to go before I started! Knowing your show really well on the script level helps you write it. I know! Crazy, huh? :)
  • In the first incarnation of my Castle script, Richard Castle hardly did anything. You see, I so desperately wanted to give Beckett and Alexis more to do, that I forgot that the show is called Castle, and if I’m going to tell an effective Castle story, that story should, you know, include Castle. :) This is funny, since in my reviews of Grimm for Tor.com, the episodes I liked least were the ones where Monroe does all the heavy lifting, and Nick doesn’t get to save the day or have the major insights. Not only do my Castle mistakes help me write other specs better, but they also help me see and articulate what I do and don’t like on current television shows. Anyway, for my Grimm spec, I’m never letting myself forget that the show is called GRIMM. Nick is the hero. It’s his story, despite the wonderful ensemble, and in the end, he has to drive the action, make the big decisions, and have the most at stake. The simple act of remembering this has allowed my treatment to come much more easily. Whenever I was at a loss for what should happen to move the story forward, I would just ask “What does Nick want?” And then words would happen. It’s like magic! In fact…

  • Trusting the characters is something else I didn’t do much in my Castle script. There were Things That I Wanted To Say, and I was basically using the characters as mouthpieces for those things. Big mistake. I wasn’t treating them like people. For my Grimm script, as I’ve been writing the treatment, I’ve been talking to the characters in my head. Just as I’ve been asking myself what Nick wants, I’ve been asking what Hank and Juliette and Monroe want. What does Renard want? And yes, what does Wu want. :) And they’ve been telling me what they want. And what they want very often conflicts with what Nick wants. OMG, CONFLICT YOUSE GUYS. :) It seems so stupid to even have to type this as a thing. But no matter who you are, there’s always the point at which you didn’t know this. And then one day, you know it. And then your writing gets better. My story feels inevitable now, because as I progress act by act through my treatment, things are unfolding naturally in the plot, because they’re all driven by characters and not by me manipulating things. I mean, I knew the basic story I wanted to tell (the crime, where I wanted the characters to end up, etc), but I didn’t know how it was going to happen. By focusing on the characters, certain things popped up that not only surprised me, but forced me to change/add other things along the way that make the whole story better.
  • Last lesson? I’m not rushing my outline/treatment. The treatment for a TV spec is only about 4-5 pages where you write out, in prose, everything that happens in your script. It seems like an easy thing, but this is really where the bulk of the work happens. Doing this right means less work later. So, I’m taking my time at this stage, and not rushing to Final Draft until I’m sure I have a quality road map to follow. This doesn’t mean I won’t have to rewrite later. But it does mean that I’ll have a better script to work with when I’m revising, unlike my poor Castle script.

The other day, on Facebook, after gleefully getting through the teaser and 3 1/2 acts in my Grimm treatment, my status was: That awesome moment when a story clicks and suddenly a script actually seems possible. :) If it ain’t broke, don’t fix it. If it IS broke, try. But if you CAN’T fix it, get a new gift horse all together. But don’t look in its mouth. Or something.

This is what I was referring to. My Grimm spec is my new gift horse. A friend of mine joked, “Just hope it isn’t a Trojan horse!” :) I’ll let you know how that turns out.

The Fray Project: Research and Fellowships (Writing)

Posted on

Hello, everyone!

And I was doing SO well. :) But I missed Tuesday’s post, which was supposed to be a Writing post. So, I’m doing it today. Sorry about that.

On Sunday, I was fortunate enough to be able to meet up with a writer on one of my favorite TV shows, NBC’s Grimm. I reached out to her via Twitter and asked if she’d be amenable to sitting down with me over coffee so that I could pick her brain about writing – totally not expecting an answer at all. She surprised me by saying yes! I wanted to speak with her specifically, because 1) she’s a writer on a show of the type that I would like to write one day, and 2) she’s a newer writer who also happens to be a woman of color, and I wanted to get that perspective. She confirmed some stuff I already knew, but she also taught me a lot that I didn’t know. Here are some kernels of wisdom I gathered:

  • Of the list of shows that I want to spec, she said Castle is my strongest choice, because it’s a popular, long-running procedural. My choice of Fringe is less strong, because it’s not clear that Fringe is gonna get another season. (Sad, but true! Please, FOX. Season 5?) She didn’t say anything about my desire to do a Doctor Who episode, but she did say that my wanting to spec Grimm was a good choice now that they have a second season, since they are also a procedural, but it’ll also allow me to get my genre-show groove on. Ultimately, since the specs are mostly for submission to writing fellowships and not necessarily to get me jobs on their own, I should choose shows that I’m passionate about, or at least choose shows in the genre I’m passionate about. Because it’s easy to tell if one is writing something he/she isn’t really into.
  • I should just have lots of stuff. Specs, original pilots, even short fiction or plays, etc. She got her job on Grimm off of a short story she wrote that her agent submitted for her. It was a modern re-telling of a fairy tale, so it was more perfect than any of the scripts she had at the ready. The point is to keep producing stories you love and always have a ready stable of current writing samples, because specs and even original pilots can become irrelevant really quickly, depending on what showrunners and producers are looking to read. Also, the short stories are helpful, because sometimes folks just don’t wanna read anything as long as 50 pages, since they get so many submissions.
  • She reminded me that there are  network writing fellowships other than the Disney/ABC Writing Program and the NHMC Writing Program, both of which I’ve applied to before, and NBC Writers on the Verge, which I was already planning on applying to this year. She received the first CBS Writing Fellowship through the USC Screenwriting program, and reminded me that CBS also has a Writing Mentorship Program through their Diversity Institute to which I can apply. Warner Bros. also has a Writer’s Workshop, as does FOX (FOX Writer’s Residency) and Nickelodeon (Nickelodeon Writing Program). So, you know, I’ve got my work cut out for me. Most of them have upcoming deadlines. :)
  • She recommended that, in addition to the ever-elusive writing assistant job (getting hired as the writing room assistant on the show, which means that you take notes as the writing team throws ideas around, sometimes getting to contribute, sometimes not), I should work on getting hired as a PA on stuff. Basically, any job that would allow me to be on-set is an advantage. Now, I’ve already been doing volunteer PA-ing on stuff, because I just wanted to learn how a set works and build contacts, but I didn’t really think about it in terms of it eventually getting me into a writing room. Huh. Anyway, she suggested just looking up PA jobs online – that that stuff is always posted. Usually around now. Um, OK!
  • She also did warn me that, while networks are definitely making an effort to be more diverse, 1) obviously that’s not enough. You have to be good. (Duh) and 2) that the “Diversity hire” can face hostility, depending on the show/showrunner/other writers/writing room environment. Not that it’s all horrible, but if you come up through a diversity initiative, you might be a little suspect. Meh. I can deal with it. Once I have the job, it doesn’t really matter to me what people think of my having that job. I’ll work my ass off and prove how much I deserve to be there. Which I will, of course.

There was some other chatter, but that was pretty much it. It was a really great conversation, and it basically gave me a lot of homework! I’m hoping to enter most of the fellowships this year, and in order to do that, I have to finish this Castle spec and work on a new one, which will likely be Grimm. Apparently, I’m working toward being an expert in nerdy procedurals. :) My first priority is to finish my Castle in time for the CBS deadline, then start my Grimm and finish it by June in time for ABC (I already entered the crappy version of my Castle script to ABC last year). Depending on which script has turned out best, I’ll send either one to the rest of them. So, my timeline looks like this:

  • Finish Castle script and submit to peeps for notes by – April 26th
  • Get and incorporate notes, get other CBS application materials together by – April 30th
  • Mail full application packet to CBS – May 1st (must be postmarked by this date!)
  • Finish 1st draft of Grimm script by – May 17th
  • Get and incorporate notes, get other ABC and WB application materials together by – May 30th
  • Send complete application packets to ABC and WB – May 31st (needs to be postmarked on or before June 1st!)
  • Send complete application packet to NBC by June 29th (postmark date)
  • Send complete application packet to NHMC Writing Program by Aug 13th
  • *bite nails as I wait to hear whether or not I’ve been accepted to any programs until Fall*

This is gonna be an interesting and busy couple of months, huh?

The Fray Project: Repairing the Castle (Writing)

Posted on

As you might have seen on The Fray Project Writing page, my writing goals for April 2012 are:

  • finish breaking down scripts of show I’m spec-ing.
  • using Sandler book, start already-written spec from scratch using what you now know to keep the story bits that work and create a script that actually works.
  • send completed script to people you trust for feedback
  • finish The Ten-Cent Plague
  • have phone meeting w/Adam about pilot script
  • have rescheduled brain-picking meeting w/TV writer

The show I’m spec-ing right now is Castle. Now, some of you might have read elsewhere on the blog that I’ve already written a Castle spec. One that I’ve already gotten feedback on, and submit to writing fellowships even. So, am I writing a new one? No. I’m rewriting the same one. Why?

Because that script was crap, that’s why. :)

Here’s the thing. When I wrote that script, I knew fuck-all about teleplay structure. Seriously. Fuck-all. So, if I got anything right, it was purely by accident. And I mostly got things wrong. The story itself, however, was a good one, and that’s what I’m trying to salvage. However, after I got little bitty notes from a couple of people, I got some serious, heavy-duty notes from someone who’s actually written for TV, and I was all, “Damn. I know absolutely nothing.” Which, of course, shouldn’t have been a surprise, since I didn’t, and had only gotten interested in writing for television about a year before I wrote that script.

After the script was rejected from three fellowships (two this past year, one the year before), I set it aside and realized I needed to get my learn on. I’ve started reading TV scripts and writing about TV more critically. Sure, my reviews of Once Upon a Time and Grimm are for a paycheck, but they’re also me trying to articulate for myself what it is that works about individual episodes and what doesn’t. During a random trip to a bookstore when I first moved to L.A, I happened upon The TV Writer’s Workbook: A Creative Approach to Television Scripts by Ellen Sandler, which has been super helpful. It gives really practical information about what scripts need to be, as well as practical insight into the business side of things, while not being ridiculously stuffy or technical like other books I’ve read on the subject.

Sandler suggests starting by finding copies of scripts of the show you’re spec-ing and breaking them down hardcore: into acts, into scenes, into how many scenes each character has, how many lines they get, how many times each location is used…the purpose being to figure out the rhythm of the show you’re trying to write. Doing this to three scripts will give you enough of a pattern to go on. It’s not enough to have watched lots of episodes, or to be a fan. Seeing how it breaks down on the page is the important bit. It’s also the bit I didn’t do at first, and because of that, the show I ended up spec-ing wasn’t Castle, it was The Alexis and Beckett Show. :) In an attempt to give them “more to do” I ended up making Castle a supporting character on his own show. None of the drama came from him, and the entire thing fell flat.

Derf. I love you, Nathan Fillion.

But now, having broken down a couple of Castle scripts, I realize that I could have given the female characters “more to do” by simply giving them one or two more pages. It wouldn’t have taken a lot to make it seem like they were more involved. Also, the show is called Castle. :) If Castle isn’t doing the ultimate figuring-out, or having the ultimate revelations, the script is wrong. Plain and simple.

And I kinda feel like an asshole even needing to say that, because of course when you say all this it makes perfect sense. Like, duh, right? But I’m not gonna beat myself up over it too much, because everyone has to start from zero when they’re trying something new. And then you learn how to do things properly. And then you don’t make those same mistakes anymore. You learn to make all-new mistakes. And you learn from those, too.

I don’t even know if I’m going to do anything with this particular script at this point. But I do love the story I’m trying to tell in this episode. I think it’s important. So, I’d like to salvage it and put it in a script that works. That will be an accomplishment all on its own. And writing it will prepare me for the next one!

Announcing: RETCON

Posted on

The RETCON Writer's Room (aka: Miley's living room): Hubby/wife writing team, Yuell and Tasha Lowe-Newsome, Miley, and me at our first writer's meeting 1/10/12!

If you follow me on Twitter or Facebook (and if you don’t, why don’cha?) you may have seen me refer to #RETCON, or talk about working on a script recently. Well, in case you were wondering what I was talking about…

When I went to the Magic Castle recently, I had the pleasure of meeting actress and producer, Miley (pronounced “me-lay” like Tarzan lying down, not “Miley” like Cyrus) Yamamoto, who was there with the group of friends with whom we were meeting up. We were all talking, and it came up that I’m a writer. Miley immediately said, “You’re a writer? I’m looking for writers. Do you have a spec you can send me? Do you have a card?” Um, yes, cool, yes, and yes. :)

We ended up meeting so that she could tell me about a webseries she’s created called Retcon. Think Buffy meets Doctor Who meets Alias.

I know. :)

When she told me the story of her pilot in that first meeting, I was kinda blown away by the possibilities and wanted to play in the sandbox of these characters and this world. Also, and this is important, Miley and I are totally on the same page as far as the kind of television we enjoy and how we feel about women and minorities in television, particularly behind the camera and in the writing rooms. She asked me if I would be one of her writers, and I said yes immediately!

This is an exciting project for me for several reasons:

  • We’re doing half-hour episodes, so it’s like writing something formatted for broadcast television. I’ve never had cause to write full half-hour scripts that weren’t specs before, so this is new and will be wonderful practice.
  • This will also be my first experience in a “writer’s room” scenario. Miley wrote the pilot, and she was going to “Felicia Day it” and try to write the whole thing herself, but while she could, she’s not primarily a writer, and she felt it would be doing the show a disservice if she did that. So, she assembled a writing team. Meanwhile, I’ve never written with anyone before, but I’m going to have to learn how if I expect to work in television for realsies. Here, I’ll be getting practice in the nitty-gritty of not taking credit for ideas I’ve contributed to other people’s scripts as well as allowing other writers to contribute to to my scripts without feeling threatened. It’ll be a great lesson in keeping my ego in check and letting the story come first. :) It’s a rare opportunity for a beginning writer, as most webseries are written by one person and, well, one can’t exactly just walk into broadcast TV. This will be good for me!
  • We gel as a team. Tasha, Yuell, Miley and I share geeky preferences and priorities when it comes to storytelling. And also, they’re all just really nice, smart people. We’ve already started talking on the phone to go over story ideas/elements. I feel like I can help create something pretty awesome with these people.
  • Look at the picture above again. Really look at it and forget about the fact that we all look like crap after hours of breaking episodes. THIS is diversity in a writing room. And we’ve even got a token dude. :) But seriously, we’re like the United Colors of friggin Benetton.
  • Oh, and SEAN MAHER (aka Simon Tam on Firefly and Sean Beasley on The Playboy Club) is attached to play the male lead. So, you know, there’s that.

I recently turned in the first draft for my first script, Episode 3, and am awaiting notes. I felt so accomplished, having never attempted anything like that before. And that’s it. From here on in, it just gets easier! :) I’m excited for this whole process!

Get ready for RETCON!

How Does She Do It?: The Case Study

Posted on

A couple of days ago, I posted “How Does She Do It?: The Short Version,” where I gave some basic tips that have gotten me to where I am now in my writing career. I did this because lately, more and more people have been asking me for advice on how to do this.

In addition to those tips, I wanted to provide context. I want to make sure people know that anything I’ve accomplished with regard to my writing has been the product of eight years of laying foundation, working really hard, writing at any opportunity, and ultimately, making the writing a priority – not a hobby. I think most people (myself included) ask people advice in the hopes that they’ll get one or two really easy things to do that will lead to Stuff Happening. But stuff, particularly in the arts, doesn’t happen quickly. It happens very slowly, which can be frustrating when you’re trying to justify to your more stable friends and family that you actually are working, and all that time that you’re spending in front of a computer or staring into space thinking about a story is actually leading somewhere. In any arts field, but particularly with writing, the payoff only comes after years of drudgery. Granted, it’s FUN drudgery. :) I mean, I’m not laying bricks or unclogging toilets. But it is work, and it takes a while. With performance careers (and I know this, because I was an actor in a former life), there’s at least the benefit of immediate gratification. Yes, there’s a rehearsal process, but people watch you perform your art, and they can see and understand the work that goes into it, and they applaud you at the end of it. No one sits around watching you write a novel or an article, and even once they’ve read your work, for every nice comment you might receive on the post, or at your blog, or by email, there are possibly hundreds more who read your stuff and don’t say anything at all. Writing, then, seems a bit more mysterious than other arts professions to those who aren’t in it, or who are new to it.

So, I thought I’d break down my career so far, warts and all. If you are in any way impressed by the things I’ve accomplished, this is what it took for me to get there.

While it might seem like my writing is ”all over the place”, I actually only write for three websites that aren’t mine. :) It used to be four, but I recently left Newsarama. I had a great time writing for them, and I loved my editors and fellow writers! But I left, because they weren’t paying me for the comics reviews I did, and I can’t afford to spend time doing non-paying work anymore. Not now that I’m doing the freelance writing thing full-time and actually need to make a living at it. Of the three sites I write for, two pay me: ChinaShop Magazine and Tor.com. I also write for PopMatters.com. PopMatters doesn’t pay, but I stay on their roster, because I do interviews for them. They give me access to some pretty great people (I’ve interviewed Selena’s sister, Bear McCreary, Jeryl Prescott of “The Walking Dead,” Eric Ladin of “The Killing,” Rachael Yamagata, and most recently, Kevin Smith for them), and I can then sometimes use those interviews at other sites that DO pay me, depending on the subject. Like, I used my Bear McCreary interview at Tor.com, and I’m pitching my Kevin Smith interview to other sites soon, etc. So, there’s a very good reason for me to stick with them for no pay. They give me fodder for articles I can get paid for elsewhere. (NOTE: PopMatters always gets the piece first. Whoever assigns me the article, or gets me the access always gets the piece first. And I always write a different piece/find a different angle if I’m going to use it elsewhere. Every editor is different and has different requirements for reusing content, so always ask.)

I started writing for online outlets back in 2002 or 2003. There was this site (that no longer exists) called CentralBooking.com that I really liked, run by Kevin Smokler, non-fiction writer and expert in how the publishing industry works. I came across it, because they were doing a week-long chat with one of my favorite authors. After participating a lot in the chat, I noticed that the site featured essays on reading and contemporary fiction, and so I wrote to the editor asking if he was accepting submissions. He gave me an “assignment” and I wrote it – an essay on the first book I remember reading. I wrote a piece about Clifford the Big Red Dog. :) I wrote a couple of pieces for that site for no pay, then the site shut down, and that was that for a while. I was working in PR at the time, as well as trying to be an actor. :)

Cut to 2007, when I discovered PinkRaygun.com. I had just gotten into reading comics in 2004, and had started indulging my resurgent geekiness online. I came across this new site, which was a female-focused geek site! I wrote the editor immediately and asked if they could use another writer. The editor, Lisa, asked me for samples, which I sent, and I started writing for them. PRG didn’t pay, but it was my first real gig, and I was doing it for clips and experience with an actual editor and actual (sort-of) deadlines. I wrote for them while having a day job until January 2010.

That’s when I got the job at Tor.com. THAT happened because I remained in touch with Kevin Smokler! Through the years we’ve sort of stayed in touch online, and in person whenever he was in town. He was in NYC from SF and invited me to a Salon 97 get-together his wife was throwing. At that party, I met a woman named Ami, who worked at Macmillan, the publishers who oversee Tor Books and Tor.com. We hit it off, and a couple of weeks later, she invited me out to lunch with a guy named Pablo, who was the then-editor of Tor.com. Once they realized what a huge geek I was, and got through conversation that I was a huge Doctor Who fan, Pablo asked me if I’d be interested in writing for Tor.com, specifically because they were lacking in Doctor Who coverage. I accepted, and was thrilled to have my first professional writing gig!

Through my geeky meanderings, I became familiar with the work of artist Molly Crabapple, and fell in love immediately. I pursued an interview with her about Dr. Sketchy’s Anti-Art School for Pink Raygun, and got to know her a little bit. As I continued to keep up with her work, I noticed that she was a contributor to ChinaShop Magazine. In August 2010, I emailed her and asked if she thought that ChinaShop would be a good fit for me, and also if it paid, as I was then looking for more paying work. She said she thought it was a great idea, and that yes, it did pay, and that I should email the editor and feel free to use her name. So I did! And the rest is history! I pitched myself as their Geek in a ChinaShop and…so far, so good! :)

As for Whedonistas….I’m a huge fan of writer, Paul Cornell. I’ve interviewed him a couple of times, I’ve been active on his blog, and I follow him on Twitter. I saw on his Twitter that the editors of Chicks Dig Time Lords – a book I LOVED – were doing a similar book about the works of Joss Whedon. When I clicked the link to the page on Amazon, I noticed that there was no contributor list. I quickly looked up contact info for the editor, and emailed her asking if she needed any other contributors, including links to writing samples in my email. She wrote back and said that I emailed her just in time, and that, if I could write/submit something in a 4-day turnaround time (the deadline for contributor submissions was looming), she’d have a look at it. I did, sent it in, and she accepted it. Later, when we were launching the book at Gallifrey One earlier this year, she told me that the day I emailed her just happened to be the day that one of their other contributors dropped out. I was filling a void I didn’t even know about! :) I got paid for that. Not a huge amount, but still. My involvement in that has led to me being invited to participate in another anthology! Info on that TBA.

The one short story I’ve had published happened because I 1) entered the NYC Midnight short fiction competition and ended up writing my first horror story, which featured a Hispanic female protagonist, and 2) Because I follow a lot of geeks/geek outlets on Twitter, I ended up following the editor of a sci-fi lit mag called Crossed Genres. One month their theme was “Characters of Color.” I submitted this story that I already had, it was accepted, and I got paid for that, too!

Now, I’m an assistant to Bob Harris, a writer who’s currently working on a non-fiction book about microfinance for Bloomsbury, and who’s written for television (Bones, CSI, etc), written other non-fiction books, and also happens to be a former Jeopardy champion. How’d THAT happen? As you probably know, I was a HUGE fan of Caprica when it was on, and was one of its earliest, most hardcore supporters online. Anyway, there was this little Caprica tie-in book that was released that was a ”Travel Guide to the Twelve Colonies.” Bob wrote that. I thought that was fun, and I read that he had a hand in fleshing out the cultural stuff on the show. I went to his website, and saw that he was now working on this book about microfinance; a topic that greatly interests me, particularly with regard to women in developing countries. In fact, all of the stuff he’d written seemed really cool and interesting.  As I was looking for more writing-related work, I emailed him via his website and asked if he needed an assistant. He emailed me back within a couple of days saying that I emailed him JUST when his former assistant – a college student who was doing it for credit – quit. :) He couldn’t pay me, but if I were interested in helping him out with his book in exchange for an apprentice/mentoring relationship, would that interest me? I agreed right away, because not only did he seem like a cool dude, but he’s really knowledgeable about a million things I want to know more about. To me, the knowledge in his brain in exchange for spreadsheets and a couple of phone calls now and then is totally a fair trade.

The thing is, you can do this, too. I don’t see myself as particularly special. I just don’t let my fear keep me from trying/asking for/doing certain things, because one thing I’m not afraid of ‘no.’ What I hope is that by laying out exactly how it’s worked for me so far, I take some of the mystery out of all of this, and maybe make you less afraid. I think it’s fear that holds most people back from doing what they want. Also, it might help that this is coming from someone who’s closer to where you are than a bigger-name writer. :)   But courage – and remember, courage isn’t a lack of fear, it’s acting in spite of it – will serve you better as a writer than over-caution. And it’s a difficult thing, I know. I quit my decently-paying day job and moved across the country just to be broke as hell and constantly struggling. But what scares me even more than poverty or instability is the thought of a life half-lived. Yes, things are difficult, and yes, for every success I’ve listed here, I’ve had ten other sites/people tell me no, but I’m still here. :) I’m scared shitless a lot of the time, but I’m still here, and I’m still mucking through. And even if I spend the rest of my life mucking through, I’ll be happy to, knowing that by taking risks I’ve gotten closer to where I want to be than I ever would have if I would’ve stayed behind a desk at a job I didn’t love.

I didn’t expect for the editor of Whedonistas to write me back. I didn’t expect Bob to write me back. Why would they? They didn’t know me from a hole in the wall. I wasn’t expecting any of these things I went after to pan out. These were all shots in the dark, but I took them anyway. As it turns out, I have pretty decent aim in the dark. :)

How Does She Do It?: The Short Version

Posted on

Most days, I think I’m a nobody. Not in a “woe-is-me,” feeling shitty about myself kind of a way, but in a clearly seeing my place in the grand scheme of things kind of way. Most days, I know that I’m at the bottom of the Writing Totem Pole. I’m getting asked to ring up books while sitting at a signing table next to Jane Espenson and Nancy Holder, if you will. This doesn’t bother me. After all, that’s what Paying Dues is all about. Being a nobody until suddenly (or maybe not-so-suddenly), you’re a Somebody.

But lately, people have been approaching me, either in person, or via the internet, asking me for advice about getting into, or moving up in freelance writing. It’s strange. Flattering, but strange. I don’t know when the point is when one feels like Not a Newbie, but that certainly hasn’t happened for me. Yet, whenever someone asks me for writing career advice, I’m forced to acknowledge the fact that, Wait a minute, I actually DO know what I’m doing. I actually DO have a certain level of experience and knowledge.

I’m certainly still in the beginning stages of whatever my writing career’s going to turn out to be. I only just devoted myself to doing this full-time about a year ago. However, I’ve been writing for online outlets since about 2003, and writing professionally since January 2010. In 8+ years of writing, I’ve learned a thing or two. Now, as is the case with every arts career, everyone is different. What works for you won’t necessarily work for someone else. I think it’s safe to say, though, that doing the stuff I suggest can only help, and certainly won’t hurt.

Know what you want to write about and be informed about what’s going on in that field. Once I started reading comics in 2004, it awakened the geekery in me that I hadn’t seen since I was a 10 yr old watching Star Trek and Alien Nation. :) I was a sci-fi/fantasy/comics geek who loved books and theater, and I knew that if I was going to write online, I’d want it to be about something I was interested in. So, I started seeing what sites were out there, reading lots, and participating in those communities.

Blog, blog, blog. But nobody reads/writes blogs anymore! Quityerbitchin’. The thing is, as a writer, your blog is the only place where you have total control of the content. Especially if you’re low on samples from other outlets, your blog can be where you write the articles you want to write. Where you put your best foot forward and write the kind of thing for yourself that you’d like to write for others. Then, you can use your blog posts to supplement any clips from other outlets you might have. Think of it as having writing samples at the ready. And if you’re worried that you’ll write something for your blog that you’ll later want to submit as a paid article somewhere else, you can always take it off your blog. That’s the beauty of the internet. :)

Make yourself indispensible! I carved out a ”Geek Girl” niche for myself, and marketed myself as that both to outlets that catered to that audience (like Pink Raygun), and outlets that don’t, but for whom I could fill a void with content somewhat related to what they do, but designed to reach out to a different readership (like ChinaShop Magazine). Figure out what it is about you that makes your point of view unique for an outlet that caters to your field of interest, OR why you’re the person an outlet needs to explore that field of interest for the first time. For me, nine times out of ten, the fact that I’m brown and have ovaries makes me the voice that’s lacking and, therefore, the voice that will fill a void. :) About what are you an expert? What is it about you that’s unique and would make your writing marketable?

Pursue writing outlets you read.  I was reading Pink Raygun for a while before I summoned the courage to ask asked about submissions. If there’s a site that you enjoy, email the editor (or follow their submissions guidelines – contact info is usually found on their website) and ask if they need anyone. You’ll get nos, for sure. But you may also get yeses! Kevin Smokler’s (no longer existant) CentralBooking.com wasn’t the first site I pursued that way, but it was the first yes!

Be open to opportunities, and don’t be afraid to pursue the ones you see! You might think that a writer/editor is “too big” to want to hear from “the likes of you,” but you’d be surprised! Don’t ever be afraid to ask. If you’re polite, and can promptly offer writing samples, the worst you’ll hear is “no.” Actually, no, the worst thing is not hearing back from them at all. :) If that happens, move on to the next thing. But I promise you, absolutely NOTHING will happen if you don’t try.

Build relationships, be it online or IRL. Notice, I didn’t say “network,” I said Build Relationships. I love people, and I talk to people not because I think they’re gonna give me a job one day, but because I’m a Chatty Cathy who likes talking to people! :) Now obviously, people know about networking. It’s not like you have to HIDE the fact that you’re a writer and want to do more of it. But rather than think about every meeting as an immediate job opportunity, just keep making friends/acquaintances with people in your field. Fellow writers, editors, people in your field of interest (like me having a 2000%* spike in Geek Girl friendships in the past couple of years!). Everyone you meet will either be a job lead/writing fodder, or might know someone who will be. If you make enough friends, and keep putting the fact that you’re a writer out there, eventually one of them will pan out into an opportunity you weren’t even expecting. Most of my opportunities happened because I was active online. Interact! :) And NURTURE relationships. Sometimes they take years to pay off, but as long as you’re nice and check in every now and again, they will! And don’t expect to get without giving. Relationships are a two-way street. Don’t be greedy. Help when and how you can.

Make yourself EPIC. This last one is more about getting your name out there and promoting the writing you’re doing, although this kind of bombast can help you get work – especially since, by pretending to be epic, you start to believe it, and it gives you the confidence to pursue those seemingly out-of-reach opportunities. What do I mean? Well, for example, if you were to meet me IRL, or if you were to actually see my life as I’m living it, you’d probably think it really boring. But whenever I put myself out there in Writer Mode – either online, or at conventions, or whatever – I sort of make every aspect in my life sound like Another Step In An Inevitably Fabulous and Wonderful Career. I sort of treat my Writer Persona as someone who’s already famous, and is merely taking the time now to remind people of that fact. Seriously, when you act like you’re a big deal, people start treating you that way. Even you. :)

Well, that’s the short version, which is fine on its own. However, stay tuned for my next post, called How Does She Do It?: The Case Study, where I put all this stuff into the context of my own life and career. Hopes this helps someone out there! (See? This is me helping when and how I can!) And writers – let me know if you think I’m leaving anything out!

*Figure derived by not using any actual math.

When Do Writers Become Assholes?

Posted on

My friend, Pendard, called me tonight to vent. The reason? He’d gone to a writing workshop with two new friends, one of whom got defensive about every single suggestion. This person could not accept the fact that any changes needed to be made to the piece at all. The worst part was that there were elements of the story that Pendard really liked and inspired a similar story that he wanted to write himself. So, he called me to vent about how maddening it was to workshop with this writer as well as to lament the fact that he would never be able to write the story sparked in him, because it would be plagiarism.

Would it? I asked.

I asked him what elements he found interesting. The basic concept was one that has not only already been done in several mediums, but it’s one that Pendard had mentioned wanting to write years ago (he’d forgotten). So, I told him that he shouldn’t feel bad about writing something inspired by her idea, because not only was the concept one that she’d likely gleaned from elsewhere, but it was one that he’d mentioned wanting to write a while back. Also, writers are inspired by (steal from) each other all the time. Also, it isn’t about the basic idea, but how well it’s executed. Also, if the writer can’t take criticism, this story is never going to see the light of day anyway.

I could hear his disappointment in me as he said, “So basically, Ms. Zuckerberg, if Facebook was their idea, they would’ve invented Facebook?”

Pendard and I have talked about The Social Network, and I remember having many conversations about that movie, because I was apparently one of the only people who saw Zuckerberg portrayed sympathetically in that film, and who didn’t think he was so entirely an asshole.

Here is where I draw my moral line: if the idea is a general concept that’s already been used, or has likely been used elsewhere, using it isn’t a douchebag move. In the case of Facebook (and I know the film differs from true events), Zuckerberg was hired by guys to work on code for a social networking site, and he improved on their idea, so he created his own. Should he have continued to take their money and waste their time when he had no intention of following through? No. And that was his douchebag move. Improving on their idea that was already derivative of already existing social media platforms was not.

What bothered me when watching that was the thought that, had Zuckerberg not gone on to make billions, the guys that sued him probably wouldn’t have cared. It wasn’t the morality of the issue that was spurring them to action. It wasn’t about their pet project, their “baby”, being stolen. It wasn’t about honor amongst computer programmers. It was about the money.  So, when Zuckerberg (played wonderfully by Jesse Eisenberg) says “If Facebook was your idea, you would’ve invented Facebook,” I was all “Hell. Yes.”

How does this apply to writing?

Well, in the case of Pendard, he clarified that he not only latched on to this writer’s larger concepts, but to specific characters and specific relationships. Once that was clarified, I said “Well, yeah, in that case, that would definitely be stealing.” So, he’s going to be writing the story as a writing exercise to get it out of his system and never do anything with it. Fine. But even after that distinction, he seemed to continue to have trouble with my position on the subject, and said (only) half-jokingly “Well, I’m never going to share any of my good ideas in a writing workshop with you ever again!”

And I haven’t been able to stop thinking about this all night. Because I genuinely believe that there are circumstances in which it’s okay to write something that riffs on someone else’s idea. But at the same time, I try really hard to have integrity and to be a Woman of Her Word. The idea that someone might not trust me in a creative context really shook me up. Naturally, I had to examine this via blogging. :)

Two things that need explaining:

1) This bias might make me an even bigger asshole than vaulting off someone else’s idea, but whether or not I respect someone as a writer makes a difference in where I draw my line. I remember saying to Pendard something like “I would never write something inspired by something you’ve written like that,” and it has nothing to do with the fact that we’re friends. The reason is that Pendard is an amazing and disciplined writer, and I believe without question that he will be published, and that many, if not all, the ideas he shares with me will be out in the world in some form someday. I see that as inevitable. We’re in a writing workshop with two other friends, and I feel the same about their work. If I genuinely believe that your talent/ambition/discipline will allow you to make writing your life, I am less likely to be interested in riffing on anything of yours, and more interested in creating something to completely distinguish myself from you. However, not knowing this other writer at all, and just knowing that the writer is the kind of person who thinks their work needs no work…that not only lessens my opinion of them, but also makes me think that their work is never going to be seen, because this person is going to be hell for any editor to work with. And if I can think of a way to salvage a kernel of a good idea, and you’re going to refuse any and all suggestions…? I might.

2) Years ago, I shared an early version of my story, “The Sandbox” (which can now be found in On the Ground Floor), with Pendard, asking him for notes. He gave me his notes, and told me he liked it by saying that he was inspired to play with it and write his own version, and that he meant that as a compliment, because when he was in high school he and his friends would do that with each others’ stories when they liked them.

If you’ve read “The Sandbox”, you know that it’s a story about a political situation using the metaphor of kids playing in a sandbox. Now, if my story had inspired him to write a story about politics using children as a metaphor, I wouldn’t have had a problem with that at all. I mean, it’s not as if I was the first person to do that. If he wrote a story using the sandbox as well as characters like mine…that would’ve made me angry.

I don’t know what I’m trying to say with all of this. This is how I feel about things now, but it could change. Basically, I’d love to hear from the writers out there about where they draw their lines when it comes to inspiration/borrowing/stealing/homage, particularly pre-publication. I’m not talking about reading something in a book/magazine then trying to pass it off as your own. I’m talking about the ideas we’re exposed to every day when we associate with other writers. When is it a riff, or inspiration, and when is it plagiarism, and is any of it OK? I’m still trying to figure it out. All I know is that I’d like very much to not be an asshole.

My Reviewing Ethos

Posted on

When commenting on Paul Cornell’s blog the other day, I mentioned the fact that I wasn’t exactly thrilled with the way he ended his Batman & Robin storyline. While I love the new villain he created in The Absence, I thought that how she turned out in the end was a bit of a cop-out. I mean, I got the point, what with her name and all, but… Well, I’ll write a separate review here another time, as this wasn’t really meant to be a review post.

The point is that Paul thought I’d ended up reviewing the issue positively, despite my reservations about it, in this week’s Best Shots Rapid-Fire reviews at Newsarama, and he commented back to me concerned that I’d written a positive review against my better judgment, saying “I would encourage you to say what you really think, even if you know the author. Most of us don’t take negative reviews from friends badly.”

I appreciated him saying that, but I’ve since corrected him: first, by telling him that another reviewer wrote the positive review he mistakenly attributed to me.  Second, by telling him that I’m not afeared of him or anyone else, and that if he ever writes something I think is crap, the world will know, as my Reviewer Pen is ready to slay and demolish as much as it’s ready to caress and coddle. (I kind of want a huge Reviewer Pen now, a la Gorilla Grodd’s Battle Spoon, or The Absence’s Scissors!)

But what he said got me thinking about how I approach my reviews. There’s definitely a method to my madness, but it’s not something I’ve ever sat down to think about before, and I think it’s something worth thinking about. So, for those of you who are interested, here are my thoughts:

1) I am someone whose natural setting is to give the Benefit of the Doubt. I give people I meet The Benefit, why wouldn’t I give works of art The Benefit, too? The way I see it, someone was trying to accomplish something and worked hard (even if the end product doesn’t show it) to create something. That is a brave act, and so I will always look for something to like about it. I’ll talk about that first before delving into the work’s failures.

2) When I review, I consider that even if something isn’t “my cup of tea,” there are people out there who like what I don’t. So I keep that in mind, and often say “I’m not a fan of this particular thing, but if you like this character/kind of story, this will be right up your alley.” I try not to review based solely on my personal taste, but based on how effectively someone did something for their target audience, which I may or may not be a part of.

3) That said, if I think something is really bad, or it bored me to tears, I’ll say so with no hesitation. Sometimes, works are just unsuccessful at what the creator was trying to do, and that needs to be pointed out, both to warn the audience and to alert the creator that Hey, this shit was boring. Write something else. I’m a writer myself, and I know how much it stings when people don’t think that every single word you wrote was brilliant. I also know that I can handle criticism, constructive or otherwise, very well. Because even non-constructive criticism is coming from an honest place of I didn’t like this, and it’s up to me to figure out why and if I care.

**EDITED post comment 3:21AM 1/15/11**

4) Given the choice, I would rather review something I feel strongly about than review something that elicits a “meh.” Of the two extremes, I would rather use my space as a reviewer to promote something I LOVE rather than tear down something I HATE. Why give something you hate extra press? :)

One of my proudest moments in reviewing was giving the comic American Vampire what was seemingly the one bad review it got. And do you know what? Scott Snyder saw that review, said he was sorry it wasn’t my cup of tea, but that he hoped I’d check out his other stuff, and then he friended me on Facebook. :)

So it’s clear to me that writers, whether I know them or not, can totally handle it. But excessive bad reviews are just as bad, to me, as overly-indulgent reviews. I don’t love everything I read, and I don’t pan everything I read either. Most of my reviews will highlight the good and mention the bad, if there is any. I try to be very balanced. This way, when I DO have an extreme reaction either way, it means something.

Comprende? :)

C’mon, Baby. Take Me Back (Beginning of Line LAUNCHED!)

Posted on

Screencap by Tray "JediTray" Chester, as featured on Beginning of Line

I know, I know. You think I’ve thrown you over for a younger, sexier website…but I can explain!

Beginning of Line means nothing to me! OK look, I know I wasn’t as attentive to our one-year anniversary as I should have been, but Beginning of Line was having some issues that I needed to help it get through. I’m here for you now. That should tell you something. If I wanted to be with Beginning of Line, I wouldn’t be here right now, would I? No, I wouldn’t.

Don’t look at me like that. Come on. After all we’ve been through, surely we can find our way back to each other. This doesn’t have to be the end. Look, I’ve even got some special features planned for you! Teresa’s Bookshelf will soon have entries about Fables Vol 3, Mockingjay, and Wild Nights! by Joyce Carol Oates. I have Pop Goes Teresa columns planned about Ke$ha and Nicki Minaj. AND I still haven’t told you about my goals for this year, including why I’m slowly becoming at least somewhat vegetarian.

And I want to do that. Share things with you. Teresa Jusino Experience, you’re the only blog I’ll ever really love. So, I’m sorry about last week. I’ll never ignore you for that long again.

(But seriously, visit Beginning of Line. It’s awesome.)

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 209 other followers